Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Amoraim cannot dispute tannaitic rulings versus tannaitic service however they authored walls within Torah to quit inadvertent sins
It report of the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi essentially eliminated every menstruating female throughout the normal monthly period group and you may placed her or him regarding the abnormal updates out-of zava since most typical symptoms last no less than three days. Apparently their concern is one because of the cutting-edge clarifications wanted to decide when one is niddah of course, if it’s possible to become an excellent zava, you to definitely you’ll come to go wrong that have grievous outcomes. Initially the new decree got limited feeling; it appears to be to have already been local, and may even was indeed limited to times when question are involved therefore the regional populace was not sufficiently read to choose in the like affairs ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Indeed it was not a general decree for all off Israel, however it try the first step in this recommendations. In the 1st one or two examples, Rabbi’s statement deals with a lady exactly who is generally a small zava or possibly a beneficial niddah. She actually is addressed in the 1st instance just like the an excellent niddah, that have a great eight-day age impurity, in lieu of someday regarding impurity during the day from bleeding, which is the rule having a zava. In the next example the woman is managed because a beneficial niddah and a minor zava should your first-day was actually from inside the the lady ziva period (the fresh eleven days ranging from menstrual periods). Throughout the third disease, she is managed since the a whole zava. Most of the around three rulings use the so much more strict status.
Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim executive free dating, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.